Company details
Information compiled from public sources
Models by Sandvik
Latest additions to the catalog
What owners say about Sandvik
Reviews, questions and photos from people who run the machines
We moderate reviews before they're published, but we don't fact-check them
Reviews are written by equipment owners and operators. Our team looks over each review before it goes live, and anyone can report a review they think breaks the rules.
We don't verify the claims made in reviews, so each one reflects the reviewer's own experience. Some reviews may have been collected from other public sources. Brands can reply to reviews but can't edit or remove them.
See something wrong? Let us know.
–
No rating yetBased on 83 reviews
Performance
4.95/5
Reliability
4.95/5
Support
4.89/5
Sort by
Relevance
Efficient on site costs
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
After 18 months, the DD422i's running costs are manageable. The QSB4.5 engine is decent on diesel for tramming, and the RD525 drill's power consumption is reasonable.
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Sarah J.
0 contributionsIs this review helpful?
0
Simple to operate and maintain
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
This rig is surprisingly intuitive. The SICA controls and THC561 panel make operation straightforward, even for new operators. Routine maintenance is simple to perform myself. Drilling 4.
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Mark O.
0 contributionsIs this review helpful?
0
Predictable Costs, Solid Performance
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
The first time we fired up the DX910i, I noted the Volvo TAD882VE's fuel use. It's quite reasonable. Drill rod wear (51mm) is as expected, keeping our running costs predictable.
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Mark P.
0 contributionsIs this review helpful?
0
Consistent Daily Drilling Power
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
For 18 months, our DX910i consistently hits daily targets for 102mm holes. The 30kW rock drill powers through, and the iCab keeps operators comfortable during long shifts.
Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Sarah J.
0 contributionsIs this review helpful?
0