What owners say about Caterpillar

Reviews, questions and photos from people who run the machines

We moderate reviews before they're published, but we don't fact-check them

Reviews are written by equipment owners and operators. Our team looks over each review before it goes live, and anyone can report a review they think breaks the rules.

We don't verify the claims made in reviews, so each one reflects the reviewer's own experience. Some reviews may have been collected from other public sources. Brands can reply to reviews but can't edit or remove them.

See something wrong? Let us know.

–
No rating yetBased on 172 reviews
Performance
4.94/5
Reliability
4.97/5
Support
4.82/5

Sort by

Consistent Performer, High Uptime

After years with older single-engine scrapers, the 657 is a significant upgrade. We run it hard, 12-hour shifts, and it consistently moves massive yardage.

Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Mark P.
0 contributions
Is this review helpful?
0
Large Capacity, Needs Room

We've had our 657 for nearly five years now. Its sheer size means careful planning on smaller sites, unlike some smaller units we ran.

Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Sarah J.
0 contributions
Is this review helpful?
0
Big Machine, Big Results

This scraper is a monster. It moves serious yardage on our large earthmoving projects, but you absolutely need the space for it. Maneuvering in tight areas is a challenge.

Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Mark P.
0 contributions
Is this review helpful?
0
Smooth Operation, Quick Training

We've had our 637 for about 18 months now. Getting new operators up to speed was surprisingly fast; the controls are intuitive. It pulls heavy loads across our site without issue.

Posted on Aug, 12 2026
by Sarah J.
0 contributions
Is this review helpful?
0